Brother Mfc 9420cn Toner Levels

What to do in Cote d'Ivoire? Nothing. Google Books

A political crisis currently taking place in Côte d'Ivoire. The incumbent President Laurent Gbagbo refused to recognize his electoral defeat and cede its place to the winner of the polls, Alassane Ouattara.

The international community is beginning to pressure Ivorian power it undergoes a democratic verdict. Diplomats accredited power are disputed. There are voices calling for military intervention and restore proper order - democracy.

is a mistake. The international community should do nothing at all.

Côte d'Ivoire is an independent country, decolonization is made. We must understand the consequences. Want

pressure or a Western intervention in Côte d'Ivoire is making Western judges of last resort of elections and political crises in Africa. That ultimately will return to Western tutelage. It therefore a colonialist position.

is also, for the most going into war, just war estimate for a secondary matter of principle, which is the form of government. So it is a neoconservative position.

the way it should be that the supporters of sanctions or overthrow Gbagbo express wonder a bit about the consistency of their position if Saddam Hussein. But it is true that Iraq is not a French colony, it does not look ... Free

everyone to adopt the position that it seems the fairest, provided to understand what associates are good intentions in this story (as in the bottom all others).

Heoinee Showing Boobs

Ngram viewer, a new tool

Google offers a valuable new tool: Google Books Ngram viewer.

The program uses the database of all the books scanned by Google to let you know the frequency of occurrence of one or more words in all the books through the centuries. Research is done by editing language. The language of Molière is present.

You can compare on the same graph text to compare their respective fortunes. It will be ignored if the interference of homonyms.

The presentation by Google's program found on this page .

Some applications

Rugby football loses cons to 1980: evidence

The presidents of the Fifth: here. Note the astonishing popularity of Mitterrand and the emergence of a political break with Sarkozy.

supplant Darwin Lamarck in France in 1860 cf here. Strangely it seems later in the United Kingdom (must be balanced with the same name on this chart) cf here.

A little love for wisdom: there .

A policy may be more interesting than it seems: here.

From the political economy here. The French can resist the thought unique pugnacity.

Strange Digging In Dogjust Given Birth

Season's Greetings

A winter's garden (Brittany) December 2010 © D. Gestin

7 Year Old Has Low Iron

How to have a snobbery in advance? Huxley and Orwell

While the masses flock to the exhibition Basquiat without knowing that his interest has evaporated provocative, others prefer to have a snobbery in advance, and will see Gerome, and his hyper-Classicism firefighter.

Why the snobbery and how to use it?

I) But what snobbery first?

Frederick Rouvillois admirably studied snobbery and in particular showed a reversal of logic that exists between dandyism and snobbery. I have not read the book in which he operates this distinction but I mention it so as not to plagiarize unintentionally. (History of snobbery, Flammarion, 2008)

Snobbery is primarily a gregarious attitude: it makes us imitate. The object of our imitation is the class that we want to belong, we feel superior to ours.

Eastern snob who copies the group he admires, but it is only copy and remains artificial, exaggerated. Unlike the dandy does not belong - so contrary logic.

Appreciation the superiority of a class is subjective. There is a snobbery of belonging to the nobility, snobbishness of belonging to the rich, intellectuals, musicians, bohemians

etc. The assessment is so subjective that idolized classes may intersect. A full copy may rapper, rapper copy the rich. The copied

generally likes not those who copy, and therefore it changes its behavior. So be careful.

In any event, the social snobbery is a given, you must accept it or close by misanthrope. Be desirable and for that you need is the snobbery advance.

II) drink and disappointments of snobbery

In imitation of the class admired the heart of snobbery, there is some projection of fantasies.

A) rich
If the rich are remarkable. The rich appears to be an extravagant person and full of arrogance. Being rich does

however no a priori orgy of vindictiveness nor a luxury. Instead, many wealthy have a thrifty mentality and if they live in comfort, they do not spend unnecessary - indeed a cause of their wealth. Too often we imagine the rich and flamboyant spenders, wondering how they could become and remain so.

If the rich seem extravagant, it was because of snobbery ... upstarts, also called "new rich. . They want to show their success, they want to prove that they belong to this class desired. And the only way they can get is to spend their money.

Thus the new rich are they spending not because the rich are spending but because they want to show rich in the eyes of all, they want their new status to oppose all.

doing enough for the rich they do not make extravagant spending to thrive in turn these new rich.

is the game of fashion described by Ernst Gombrich in his writings.

But the image of the rich and arrogant spendthrift has been installed permanently, resulting in a necessary process that can not be upset: the snobbery of upstarts.

This conclusion is certainly generalizable to other classes: the hatred which they suffer is not so much to their elements as snobs who affect to be. For what they basically copy: not the reality of this class, but the projection of this class such that their prejudice their own shows.

Lessons: If you have money, spend it so refined; stand out imitators



B) Marks

Another application of snobbery: the marks. There is a hierarchy of clothing brands.

The more one holds clothes whose brands are on top of the ladder, the further we move from peasants dressed trademarks of low prestige. The more one thinks rise. But it simultaneously reveals his need to distinguish themselves from the masses and imitate the best - in our eyes. Therefore it is betrayed. It has escaped no one that many brands supposed to be great luxuries are carried by vulgar people. So the good

snobbery will not wear marks, or at least no visible mark. Dear reader, hast thus avoids you in advance snobbery brands.

But you earn a time for those you want to copy you distinguish yourself in turn.

Although ... imitation is not easy. Our bad taste show the class to which we belong and that to which we aspire. They betray us. Hence the usefulness of snobbery in advance.

Lesson: Do not wear visible marks

III) snobbery applied to exposures

postulate that in our time we do not ask as to the art of representations of a fragrance beauty of suffering.

Currently we have in Paris, Monet addition, exhibitions of Basquiat and Gerome. The snobbery in advance will be to go see the show's most original, that will not see the masses.

From October 15 to January 30, you can see Basquiat Pompidou.
From 19 October to 23 January, you can see Gerome Musee d'Orsay.


Gérôme is just the villain of the story art. In the nineteenth century, he championed a style of painting almost photographic representation and recourse to anecdotes: an art firefighter (so named to mock all these historical helmets reminiscent of those firefighters), an art felt heavy and hollow, and demagogic with these historical scenes and edifying for all these naked women on flimsy pretexts. Especially

Gérôme fought vigorously painters ideas and new styles, condemned the famous and glorious salon des refuses.

Ultimately, the story gave Gerome harm and sentenced to oblivion. To highlight the principal author of these firefighter, the Musée d'Orsay has seen fit to justify himself, as if his past glory does not warrant that the viewer can make up their own minds!

Unlike Basquiat image of a provocative and controversial artist. Yet without extending it, he became a maddening conformity to love and celebrate Basquiat for subversion since well wilted. 20 years ago yes, today not.

So the little scent of sulfur is he really - you'll understand - the exposure of the Orsay Museum, and he will flee from Pompidou filled with imitators one step behind.

However, if you believe the weakness of that art has nothing to do with subversion, that this belief is more distressing banality, that art can not be defined without reference to beauty, go your way these two exhibitions, or visit them for information - and win the race snobbery.

Lesson:'ll see Gerome

Non Confidentialityagreement

compared

Here's a cute little cartoon on Huxley and Orwell, it is yours to click to read properly. (Well no: click here to view the format most suitable)

The design is creative, delicious and the text put into perspective brilliant thoughts of the two authors.

Both Aldous Huxley, George Orwell described in novels famous for having shaped the history of totalitarian worlds. But the mechanisms of these worlds differ substantially and it is the merit of this comic highlight it so beautifully.

That said, I did not really like 1984. Orwell's satire I prefer the excellent anti Animal Farm.

Why is it that 1984 leaves me cold? Because somehow anticipated by totalitarianism Orwell was made in the USSR. But it is remarkable that this regime has collapsed from the inside specifically to internal causes, spontaneously. Exit therefore the possibility of an end of history as great minds omnipresent dictatorship.

The cartoon also seems to hold accordingly.

The text is by Neil Postman in "Amusing Ourselves to Death", drawing by Stuart McMillen. I shot the image of this last blog I here.

Pattycake's Model Real Name

The reversal of hysteria in the U.S. The

remember above all that in a bipartisan system, the objective ally of the ruling party an edge is the party Challenges on the other side. I'm not coming here on the various illustrations of this rule.

Two years ago I wrote an article explaining how the right beat left .

To summarize my article at the time, I explained that Presidents Bush and Sarkozy drew a picture of each party governing rightist though in fact the center-right, so what good hysteresis their opposition and divide between moderates and excited. So they based their power.

Remarkably United States today is that this mechanism has turned against the right: tea parties, a movement on horseback between libertarianism and populism, are reinforced with a speech very hostile to Obama, but mostly at the expense of Republicans in my opinion.

So a few years ago the Left was divided between intransigent anti-bush liberal and moderate criticism of Bush, they fear extremism of those. Today the line is divided between the same uncompromising anti-establishment anti-obama and moderate criticism of Obama, they fear the same extremism of those.

Hysteria has changed sides. The reversal was done in two stages.

First he had to unite the left. How to re-link between left Michael Moore and that of the establishment? Answer: by presenting a candidate who embodies the progressive ideals. So it's no coincidence that the bid was played between a woman and a black. Such a candidate neutralized the destructive capacity of leftists, who could only yield to the fear of being on the wrong side of history and block the forward march of progress. Fiat Obama, a man who could embody a leftist dream while being a staunch centrist. Perfect combination.

Then the Republican camp was divided. The Republicans promise eternally late big government but never really give a result in power, that they now criticized by the tea parties.

There is also the downfall of the neocons, associated with the establishment Republican, held accountable for the Iraq war which is perceived badly the foundation and utility. The tea parties, more libertarian, and therefore oppose the war in Iraq benefit.

Finally it is a general rejection of the elites and the authorities, even a conspiracy movement, who knows illegitimate and does not wish to comment as such. He needs to be grafted to another speech and found this expression vector in tea parties - which I condemn Notice the movement forward.

So Republicans are unable to capitalize on errors and Obama will lose in fine tea party movement. The rule set out in the lead article is the test may be even earlier than I had expected because it appears that Republicans could not win the legislative end of the year when he was still expected there is little they are the big winners.

Contemporary Drapery Rods -traverse

-on-me-me-not-the-fact not in battle against the banks

"I do it makes me not! We flew it robs us! "The

-on-me-me-not-the-fact not an entire program. They do not really know what they are talking but ... but ... we they do not! "All rotten! "

You do not agree with them? "Naive! Useful idiot! "Already

Paul Valéry noted that the void of themselves as kings dethroned: blame the system that considers not only the fair value!

Societe Generale loses five billion? Our friends feel robbed. The same

wins its case? This proves that the system is rotten.

The tax refund to the bank taxes it paid on profits vanished? "Stop thief! "

Ah, if given power, they will cut a few heads and will restore the republic, virtue and justice ... Because for monmlfp policy comes down to fight against the Gentiles upset pourrivendus necessarily allies. They are also always on the windward side, supporting a proposal and then another, usually incapable of understanding that may well contradict the well and the art of politics is a lesser evil.

Thus there is no doubt that our friends who revile the court needed to win the general interests of society would be the first to call for judicial independence while being the first cons screaming as the practical consequences of this decision.

And monmlfp will, of letters from readers in forums everywhere groaning, still jeering, spread their ignorance and stupidity.

If we can rejoice at the misfortunes of the trader, how to be sad at the reaction of the hoi polloi in this case?

So where does one find the best concentrations monmlfp? Answer: In letters to the editor and especially among lemonde.fr, which has a section dedicated to the reactions (I do not even speak the National Socialist press). Ah, if there were only heading to read newspapers, I would take the letters from readers. Obviously a lot of people feel there is finally to exist a little small stating his opinion needy. (Well that's true for any internet) What a wonderful

sottisier: we learn that the decision against Kerviel to repair the entire damage of the Societe Generale is a righteous religious orders or so of power, that c 'is a perpetual conviction that the community that pays so.

But this is an illusion that provides Internet: we believe that we are only intelligent when it is others who are idiots. Let us be modest

and rationally refute some of the most common charges. Explain.

No, the 4.9 billion is not a sentence. This is compensation for the damage caused by the trader at Societe Generale. The court charged the full responsibility for the damage to the trader and sentenced to repair it. Thus

Societe Generale is bleached. Even though she might have committed any negligence, the trader has committed intentional offenses causing the injury. And because it is intentional crimes, the possible negligence of the bank are not in the calculation.

Here the decisive decision. For the court, "Whereas it is nevertheless clear discussions and pleadings that Societe Generale was the victim of deliberate act of Jerome Kerviel, constituting the offenses of embezzlement, forgery and using false and introducing fraudulent data into a system of automated data processing, he was guilty, that the negligence attributable to the plaintiff can not be taken into account in determining the extent of his rights to compensation resulting from the commission of willful violations, in fact, Jerome Kerviel was the sole designer, founder and director of the fraud scheme that caused damage to the plaintiff, it follows that Societe Generale is in right to obtain full compensation for financial loss resulting therefrom, "

The ruling also has the merit of showing another failure of the strategy of rupture. Play the card of public opinion turns ultimately an admission of weakness. We can see this article to learn about strategies Bursting .

Counsel for Jérôme Kerviel seems to be more involved in the break by saying that the bank would have earned 1.7 billion of Treasury, that monmlfp immediately understood as an offering to the temple of the state when speculative is only the refund of taxes which the cause of the payment has disappeared: the benefits disappear and thus even the corresponding taxes. Only the best good demagogic sophistry can say that money is paying the French finance mistakes.

Too complicated for monmlfp? There is no doubt about that. And even more difficult: the inability to enter unpleasant conclusion in a small system with small squares; even inability to enter into a new conclusion or conclusions coincide with the assumptions and the arguments are only rationalizations for ugly stereotypes and the setting charge of usual suspects.

For the culpability of banks is not only the result of reasoning monmlfp is still the starting point.

And no matter the reasoning, their truth is that finance steals the brave citizens, that the bank knew that its trader always did, and then a court is too complicated to read, and then the system is sold. And what good arguments for them ... we do not.

Violet Brown Haircolour

SPACE 2010 (14-17 Sept.)

For the sixth year, the company NUTRI ADVANCE GROUP ENTERPRISES will be present at SPACE (the living animal production) through its Feed Division.

We look forward to welcoming you on the stand that we share with Zoopôle e in Hall 4, Aisle C, No. 90, to talk about the different ingredients Progress ™ proposés par NUTRI ADVANCE.

For the 6th year, Company NUTRI ADVANCE GROUP ENTERPRISES will be present through its Feed Division at the SPACE Livestock Show .

We will be happy to welcome you at the stand we share with the Zoopole , in Hall 4, allee C, No. 90, to inform you about the various innovative products we offer.

Life Expectancy After Throat Cancer

The name of the father

The child bears the name of the father. Why this institution? Questioned why her?

The mechanism is fought today: taken as a free ride given to the exclusive benefit of the father, it appears illegitimate.

As a result the Legislature can now give the names of both parents to the child.

Yet it is not without relevance for the child to the father's name.

Indeed, if the paternity of the child for the mother no difficulty, one in respect of the husband is not absolute. Therefore the companion of the mother recognizes the child positively or by implication - it is the husband. The law provides for a presumption of paternity of the husband on the head.

paternal recognition is manifested in the transfer of the name. Thus the child's parentage is established in respect of both parents.

This reason is enough to justify the name of the father that the child wears. But there is another: in recognizing the child, the father is obliged to support himself. Such an obligation indirectly protects the mother.

The social institution of the transfer of the name of the father the child is not a favor granted to the father but unnecessary proof of what he has recognized and is therefore obliged to respect the child and mother.

Yet on behalf of the interests of the latter and equality that removes this institution. A classic.

Diagram Of Organizational Behaviour

Liberal Dictatorship? Liberalism without democracy?

For a number of people reading Hayek comes down to a small quote taken out of context by anti-liberal books and blogs. It can be found in this form: [better] a "liberal dictatorship to a lack of liberalism in a democratic government. "A double

range is attributed to that quote.

First a general statement is better and the market dictatorship than democracy.

And then, especially because it was made to a Chilean newspaper right under the Pinochet dictatorship, it would mean that Hayek would support Pinochet.

Sometimes the whole is wrapped in a beautiful story, with Hayek and Friedman's Machiavellian advisers caudillo.

Both the general and specific interpretation is wrong.


I) No support for Pinochet

First interpret the quote as support for Pinochet collapses if one reads verbatim seriously what Hayek said.

The exact quote, with which accompanies it, is " I would say that, as institutions for the long term, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a need for a transitional period. Sometimes it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, one form or another of dictatorial power. [...] Personally I prefer a liberal dictator rather than a democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression is that [...] in Chile, for example, we will the transition from a dictatorial government to a Liberal government. ( interview with the Chilean daily newspaper''[[El Mercurio ]]'', April 12, 1981, according to the documentation Institute Hayek)

If Hayek states that the Chilean regime will change from dictatorship to liberal, it is that Pinochet and his regime were not a liberal. qed

be added only if it is true that the Pinochet regime is a dictatorship that the general has violated the law for themselves in power, we can not equate the President Allende in paragon of democracy. One governed by short-circuiting Parliament, which held the majority and demanded his dismissal. Allende's party, he has finally shown generally respectful of the letter of the constitution except in his mind, never had an absolute majority and behaved in a more than unpleasant with his opposition in his last months.

It is therefore premature to equate the dictator Pinochet and Liberal Democrat anti-liberal in Allende.

In any case it is wrong to understand this quote as endorsing Pinochet when Hayek hopes for a liberal evolution of the dictatorial regime of the latter.


II) No undemocratic political theory

Then the general interpretation of the famous quote as a rejection of democracy in favor of the market is false because Hayek does not limit the liberalism to which it refers solely to economic liberalism.

Recall that for the anti-liberal, Hayek would oppose democracy to economic liberalism. Yet never in his quotation, whether the original or an altered version, Hayek does not limit liberalism to economic liberalism. What is

Hayek is the confusion, frequent, between notions of liberalism and democracy.

Uncertainties on the concept of democracy

Today everyone is a Democrat. The price of this unanimity is considerable uncertainty about the definition of that concept.

Is it the law of the majority, the general consensus of an egalitarian movement, the rule of law, a division mode of passion, a realistic system of peaceful transition to power ? (You can see this old article which collects quotes about democracy and shows the variety of approaches.)

Democracy is confused with related ideas, foremost among which is liberalism.

Democracy should be defined primarily as a mode of appointment of governors by the method of universal suffrage. The government of the people, by the people and for the people (quote from Lincoln found in the French Constitution). If this system is desirable, it is not sufficient because the majority may want one badly, at the expense of minorities.

Democracy can fail and elsewhere Hayek comes precisely from a country where the failure of democracy has had serious consequences. He acquired British citizenship in 1938, refusing the Anschluss.

Confusion between democracy and liberalism

liberalism itself must be understood against the powers-limiting and other mechanisms of power: the press, the market, the rule of law etc..

But liberalism is not enough to make a government, we must still popular support, legitimacy, these mechanisms. Democracy is now the regime is perceived as more legitimate when they are not alone and it is also legitimate per se in that it integrates the whole body politic in the electoral process.

is why it is necessary to combine democratic ideas and liberal.

And what we usually call democracy is precisely the liberal democracy, a combination of liberal and democratic ideas. But it is conceivable that other combinations to do.

Democracy opposes the dictatorship, liberalism is opposed to absolutism.


victim of its success, the combination has become confusing. This is such between the two concepts that defended many proponents of democracy is really the liberal democracy which has been substantially emptied.

For example, it is fashionable now to define democracy as pluralism or pluralism has precisely nothing to do with pure democracy, which is the government of the people. Pluralism is, like liberalism, a complement of democracy. To these supporters, one is tempted to ask whether they prefer a democracy without pluralism or pluralism without democracy ...

should therefore restore meaning to words and to distinguish between ideas. Hayek and show us that liberalism is not democracy, it is possible to conceive of one without the other and the order.

The same typology as Peter ... Rosanvallon

For those who are unconvinced, indicate that the typology presented here, distinguishing between democratic and liberal ideas commonly confused, of course, is not unique to Hayek. It's also found in Pierre Rosanvallon, which does not appear to be a libertarian. In his book

Democracy Still, the author presents a liberal regime without democracy and without a democratic liberalism.

These respective regimes of Louis-Philippe and Napoleon III.

And indeed better than Louis Philippe-Napoleon III.


III) The need for timely dictatorship

Hayek also said black and white that it is against the dictatorship except when necessary as a transitional measure.

But such a statement is absolutely clear. Dictatorship, as defined in the Roman institution of absolute power but characterized by its legality, legitimacy and its temporary nature (read among typology Aron) is necessary for any diet.

The 5th Republic itself provides three modes of dictatorship: the full powers of Article 16, the state of emergency and martial law.

If politics is the art of the lesser evil and calming of passions, sometimes the demagogues are ready to take the place of policy. Sometimes the social body and dissolve the civil war approach. He must then save liberal democracy and peace, and dictatorship is necessary.

This is particularly true of historical experience that marked Hayek: the overthrow of the Weimar Republic by the Nazis. It would have been better than the old elites and the Democrats maintain the regime by force rather than let the demagogues, some of their democratic legitimacy.

Everyone in their right mind will agree with this statement ... unless it is Hayek who pronounces ...

Conclusion


What is remarkable with this joke of Hayek, is that it loses its offensiveness if you appreciate a little rigor content.

Democracy is not an abstraction of the more abstract that defines it as an absolute good, is a method of appointment of governors by the people who can fail.

The dictatorship is not that illegal and illegitimate exercise of power is still the possibility that reserves any plan to increase its powers in exceptional circumstances to protect the country from civil war.

Genital Covering In Movies

Why young people do not get a job?

Why young people do not get a job?

Where it is claimed that Nicolas Sarkozy is not for nothing (to increase my draw as the newspapers?)

Two reasons to question the title:

1) The lack of economy by youth
2) Ignorance of the economy by the old.

And I'm not talking about the discipline of social sciences but human interaction and exchange of the production.

Begin.

1) Young people do not understand the economy

Far be it from me to play in the national education demagogic anti Yet the problem lies partly in our education system.

Both the content of education as the mode of teaching have perverse effects.

Content - The content of teaching abstract, is largely irrelevant to the future professional life. It would be curious to know what proportion of workers uses his knowledge acquired in school for his business? Definitely a weak hand.

It is worthwhile to learn the history, Latin, and organic chemistry. But these teachings have no practical purpose. And because of their number, they take up more teaching manuals. (Crowding)

It is true that students, in keeping with the times, have little regard for the teaching manuals.

It is especially true that the real purpose of the content of teaching is not to teach but to select. Should we be satisfied with this hypocrisy?

Thus the education system appears to us already separated from the production system, which allows me to come to the second part the problem, and most important mode of teaching.

Teaching methods - After all these years on the benches of the school, the student has assimilated the logic. However he does not know that the world of work. Now the two worlds obey very different rules.

At school he asked the student to be obedient (including and even especially in matters where it is said to express the spirit of criticism). Obedience and thus the right notes all the doors open. In the school system you are free to guide you as you would be subject to the notes permit. And to have these notes, we must dig. It's the same logic as pocket money. We must know how to balance between demand and be wise.

In the world of work, obedience is required but what is required above all is to be useful, productive. It must make money, at least to cover its own cost.

But the student, he does odd jobs or not, seems to remain a prisoner of the logic of the school: he believes the right to choose as he wishes his career path by paying for his effort.

But this is nothing. The worker become does not fit in a school but on the labor market. He can choose what he wants but what the market offers. The market offers just about everything, but not at the same price, the price depending on supply and demand and therefore the social value of employment required and the scarcity of talent needed.

In other words, the school serves is itself in the world of work we are in the service of others, because the cons-party compensation is made trravail, service record.

The lack of integration between education and the production system has resulted to nourish illusions. The working world is made of jobs that must satisfy both producers and consumers.

believe that society should provide everyone with the job he wants is unrealistic and selfish. In this sense - and only this - that Thatcher had told There Is No Such Thing as Society .


circuis Sealing between education and production also has the perverse effect of promoting the atomization of the individual. This fragmentation manifests itself in several ways. First, as noted above, it feeds the belief that the individual chooses the path that do not care regardless of what the company request.

other hand is the work that integrates the best in life. In this regard include the full truth of a formula that has unfortunately corrupted the Nazis: Arbeit macht frei. By cynicism or to deceive their victims, the Nazis placed this formula at the entrance to their camps. Nevertheless, this formula is widely their earlier testimony and in my opinion a profound truth.


A final word about the artificiality of the school process. It is remarkable that the knowledge acquired at school are actually very quickly forgotten. Proof is in the spelling of all these students who left school as soon forget what they were taught to abide by the conventions of the groups they follow.

Get rid of this idea of a school that would serve as a cocoon where you teach in a neutral knowledge to minds blank.

How about it?

Sometimes I think that a solution could be to establish a kind of stock trades with prices would be communicated to students. In other words, students would experience revenue for each position and may be decided according to its price, even choose to be poorly paid but what you want.

But such a solution is likely to generate envy and social hatred.

I will therefore advise the integration between education and work history to dispel the earlier tragic misunderstandings.


2) The old man did not understand anything more to the economy

This is an optimistic hypothesis to explain their behavior because there is an alternative:

- The old man did not understand anything about the economy,
- They are deliberately malicious and prevent youth from getting a job.

Rigidity at the entrance of the labor market

We know the song, for social protection systems is the increased cost of labor and ultimately unemployment

Since it is not possible to return without risk severe financial penalties are hiring less.


simple and rational arguments but not understood by many people. It is the theory of insider / outsider. Summa divisio of the new world of work is that which separates those who have jobs and are protected by the system against those who have no work and are very insecure and have to accept various types of jobs precarious for the privileges of the first category.

If the PAYG system (sending Petainist way) is telling: not only does it ever increasing burdens on workers and thus increases the cost of labor and ultimately thwart the hiring of youth but in addition there is a wealth transfer from young to old. Doubling antisocial.


Negation productivity differences

Young people are less productive in that they are not trained and do not know the routines and generate logically less production. It should be added to what we lose in the short-term productivity of their trainers.


This is true in areas of high specialization.


In addition the employer takes a risk by hiring a new person as it may be incompetent and represent a dead weight now.


The new worker is producing less gold production that once sold gives revenues to the company and pay salaries. As a result it is illusory to believe that the new entrant should be paid like all other employees. To deny this is to prevent young people from getting to work.


Dominica de Villepin when he was prime minister, briefly introduced the First Employment Contract (CPE) which facilitated the breakdown between employer and hired a young CPE. Interpreted as the precariousness of youth employment, such a measure was intended rather to facilitate the integration of young people in the world of work.

Many young people marched and obtained the withdrawal of the CPE. Two consequences: they have removed a tool that was made in their interest, and they paved the way for the victory of Nicolas Sarkozy at the right time by eliminating its principal rival on the right. Funny, no?


Ultimately precarious increases. It is only the inevitable consequence of a youth who goes to jobs that society does not demand and labor costs too high. Emergent


a bunch of insecure jobs. The biggest success is that of course: it gives the employer a worker unskilled, poorly paid, and exploitable without continuity, it offers the student a wave formation and the right to register an online resume that approximates the Holy Grail: CDI ... The internship allows most short-circuit any legislation to protect workers.


Who emissions too bad hugs. The protection of workers turned against the weakest among them.

In conclusion: what to do?

Teach better economy? Let down.

There are two things to do: 1 / integrate education and vocational training, 2 / flexible labor laws.

Poodle Mix With Chow Chow

Cock stuffing

Aaah the World Cup. As always we will suffer the onslaught of editorial writers in mind that hardly complain about the ubiquity of football. The soccer players are delighted, and even the onlookers are enjoying.

But this year, are fans of farce are thrilled because it currently taking place will remain in annals of comedy and infamy.


an article is justified to the point!

First Team France in extremis qualifies for World Cup as very doubtful. Thanks to the play-offs held following an interpretation of regulations and a complacent goal scored against Ireland on an assist against ... hand.

it bodes ill. But with the France team irregularity is the rule: finalist in 2006, last in 2002 (although ...), favorite winning in 1998, absent in 1994 ... You never know: Team France will perhaps be the one ...


Prime match, against Uruguay: zero goals, draw. At this time we do not suspect anything, it is unclear that the national team is preparing a surprise that will eclipse the ridiculous waiting for other teams such as Italy team champion, eliminated in first round of last his hen - hen consists of New Zealand, Slovakia and Paraguay ...

second game of the France team, against Mexico: splash, the team collapsed. The score of 2-0 does not reveal enough domination of a team and the indigence of another. Qualification is compromised. It

chained to a psychodrama: Anelka, star striker full ad campaign in France, had insulted the coach Domenech to halftime. He refuses to apologize and is excluded from the team.

To block and identify the scale, the France team refuses to train. The team appears to the public like a bunch of small bosses. The rumor is that Gourcuff would have been excluded from the selection for childish reasons. We admire the gradation in the event and the sequence of gags.

It begins to intellectualize the failure of the selection of all possible ways ... Blame it on immigration, multiculturalism, money, liberalism, to Sarkozy etc.

Third match against South Africa: everyone has eyes only for the nice Gourcuff ... receiving a red card ... No longer add the cup is full. Final score: 2-1. And it is worth mentioning that the first goal was made even before the expulsion of the French player.

France is logically last in its pool and eliminated.

Exit France? Not because the politicians get involved and share the fun!

Roselyne Bachelot lectured the French players ... crying!

Nicolas Sarkozy meets Thierry Henry, the star forward who has little played, probably kept cool to spin a hand in for the game.

Policies want the heads fall to the FFF.

Furious interference, FIFA threatens to suspend French federation !

What novelist could have imagined Machiavellian farce if these reminders, these obstacles? One word: magnificent.

With that, good game

Most Expensive Pinball

Poems for the future of freedom and determinism Belgium

Taranne Thanks for having provided us these unforgettable lyrical flights, that passion does not always in the most polished language. Here follows the text of which Taranne cheer up maybe our Belgian friends.

the aftermath of elections that have caused a disaster unfortunately not really unprecedented in our political life, the newspaper La Meuse Quiet asked two great Belgian poets - one Flemish and one Walloon - express their feelings and their vision for the future. They gave us two powerful texts that are reproduced below. The ELAN

Jan Van Pademaas

Born in 1935 in Geeleecrock, Jan Van Pademaas is one of the great Flemish poets, many times considered for the Nobel and discredited by critics. His epic "Vlaanderen vrijgegeven (Flanders Freed, 1966) won him many awards. He said he wrote this poem as a sign of concord, to reaffirm the unity and brotherhood that lie at the heart of the Belgian identity and has chose the French "because it is a beautiful language that is proud to speak fluently, not like those lazy Walloons who refuse to learn Dutch".

Flemish Lion is a peaceful animal
It shows teeth that compelled and forced him
For all violence is painful
But it was not him who started

All he wants is to live in peace
With his family, but the door still open
For what he preaches, he, he does not like the southerners
m. ...

Yes what he wants is to live in their own language
Like his brothers living in their
Infoutus they are released from their matrix
These damn francophone misfortune

He asks only forget and forgive,
For it is love and tolerance at the bottom
However those who continue to rub
may pack their bags for France.

In these difficult times, these hours stretched,
Where reason must prevail alone
We, my brothers, keep Stretched
Preferably in the mouth.

The ELIO
Patrick Dimwitte

Moudubeek Born in 1950, Patrick Dimwitte is considered one of the major voices in contemporary French poetry. Award-winner Volapuk and Capernaum, his uncompromising modernism has been compared to René Char, Yves Bonnefoy, Aime Cesaire and Dominique de Villepin. He wanted to express in this poem his terror, but also, despite all his hope. "


Wallonia, my land, my flesh Your legs
ethical nation menopausal
weep their eyes without eyelashes
Tears of Blood the bitter defeat
But they still support you in your face
Dioscure northerner
milk teeth, mane junk
A slobbery mouth lies
Dancing the tango traitors
On the grave dug yet
From our common soul.


Wallonia, my mother, my sister, whose cry You
dormant inside of me Like the river
screaming into oblivion
It's your breast that arises
A bully whose sword is your virtue
And your tongue is the shield
To save the three colors
And tame the northern
Iago's name to scent the Eastern Mediterranean
triumph of opening your
The strength of his character
Is victory your values
Whether it bowtie
Either the white plume
Who embodies Wallonia O, O homeland, Thy proud major
prepared to face pale
Of these assholes flamoutches of m. ..

White Disharege Instead Of Peroids

It is customary to oppose freedom and determinism.

The idea is simple: if everything is preordained, if not fancy things obey eternal laws, then freedom does not exist.

Certainly the universe is regular. This fact alone attests to the existence of universal laws that govern them. The new instant after the previous one, I'm still here and not across the country - which could not be more desirable in freedom. So all things are as they should be, barely processed according to the order of things and dropped the apple moves on, the train continued its advance, the apple becomes more mature, the sun is lit warmer.

Things are completely determined, material is forced.

This is not only consistent with the need but still is with freedom.

For it is because things are determined necessarily obey the laws, that the mind can act upon them.

So I can stop the apple from his fall. The apple does not pass through the hand. Nor does it deflect its course.

Things being determined, the fact that they obey laws, in effect makes events predictable and can act on them.

If the universe was not governed by laws, so human action would be condemned. No freedom exist.

What freedom if I articulate a sound when no one comes out of my mouth? If I look right when I see the left?

Far from being opposed to freedom, determinism things is the necessary condition.


"Since man is free to whom everything happens as it wishes," said a fool, I also want everything happens as I please. - Hey! My friend, madness and freedom are never found together. Freedom is something not only beautiful, but very reasonable, and there is nothing more absurd or more unreasonable to form desires reckless and wanting things to happen as we once thought. When I called Dion to write, I must write, not as I want, but as it is, without changing a single letter. It is the same in all the arts and the sciences. And you want the biggest and most important of all things, I mean freedom, it means the reign whim and fancy. No, my friend: freedom is the desire to make things happen, not as you please, but as they arrive. "

Epictetus, Entretiens , 1.35.

course applies to determinism but also human freedom has never been the omnipotence that for those who sought to deny.

Stomach Sitting Squash

10 years ... Mouton

and to celebrate this event

short stop here Tuesday, because no question of staying idle hands in the air!

Heartburn Luq Pain Pressure

THE BOX IDEAS

A recipe you want to share, the desire to organize a hike, a picnic. A note ....
This space is yours: just click on comments right here:

Gay Who Taking Althea Comment

The reauthorization of the media and its treatment Ketum

Some time I go see the following information: the Ketum, a cream used by athletes, was reauthorized in emergency by the State Council, and it would be crass economic reasons for disregarding the public health. Several newspapers have echoed it.

Afssaps has indeed suspended by decision of 17 December 2009 the sale of products containing ketoprofen due to a health risk. The State Council overturned an interim decision January 26, 2010.

Why have we heard? Because the media have interpreted the decision through the administrative court Supreme and it was written that the Council of State would give priority to economic considerations over those of public health.

What is true is that the State Council has partly justified its decision by citing the financial impact of the decision AFSSAPS for the producer concerned, the ketum constituting its second most important product, so that the decision undermined the marketing of its viability.

But what any lawyer would point out is that taking into account the economic impact by the State Council was unlikely to decide the bottom end but to decide whether the procedure of referred was open.

The summary procedure, which can act very quickly, can be implemented only in certain cases, the assumption being that Queen of the emergency. And the economic case had to end so that the most likely to pave the way for interim relief.

It is this interpretation that the doctrine - even a simple but serious reading of the decision - see Gazette confirms the palace, March 10, 2010, p. 8.

Again we regret the media treatment of a judicial decision: it consists of across and is believed to find confirmation of his prejudices, in this case the common place of submission of justice pharmaceutical lobbies, the avatar we cover everything we are told nothing. Here the media do not mediate the conflict nor power but catalyze the prejudices of their readers.

On the merits, the State Council has reauthorized the product because the amount of marginal cases of reactions to the product, such cases usually result from a job does not respect the order.

In conclusion, remember to enjoy yourself with information.

How To Calculate A Calorie Arc

NUTRI ADVANCE at ILDEX

Professionnels vietnamiens, mais aussi de Thailande, de Taiwan, de Corée, Philippines and many other countries in the Asia-Pacific came to see our booth the ingredients Progress ™ proposed by NUTRI ADVANCE, in particular the product SANICAROB ™ based Carob is rich in MOS, which has a rich potential for aggregation of Gram-negative and is therefore safer digestive animals.

Professional staffs from Vietnamese Companies, "as well as people from Thailand, Taiwan, Korea, Philippines and others Countries of the Asia-Pacific area o Have visited booth ILDEX At The Show in order to discover Innovative Ingredients Promoted by NUTRI ADVANCE In Particular SANICAROB ™ has new product is based carob, rich in MOS, With A High Potential of aggregation of Gram-Germs (coli and salmonella).

Tamil Kavithai In English Words

cabbage leaves (Thanks Elias)

Hello,

17/02 to The Local:
- chickens, guinea fowl Anne and Jean-Pierre QUANTIN
- Flours and Pulses in direct sales and Saphia benoit MASS
- Vegetables for sale direct from the farm "The field of sinks Charny
- Honey Gingerbread Jerome ERLEM

The 17/03:
- Chickens, vinegar and oils Jean Christophe and Aissata
- Beef Julien
- Flour and pulses in direct selling Saphia and Benoit MASS
- Vegetables for sale direct from the farm "The field of sinks Charny

The

14/04 - chickens, guinea fowl Anne and Jean-Pierre QUANTIN
- Flour and pulses in direct sales Saphia and benoit MASS
- Signing of contracts for the prediction of your producers

A veal is expected in May / June: in your contracts. thank you.

Mexicas Woman Follando

Storing power in France? Two

Storing power in France? This is a political issue of primary importance order. Political instability had killed the Fourth Republic, it seems, or seemed that the fifth was beginning to take this path in turn: for thirty years, he is a law which means that the majority loses the election. But perhaps the remedy he found ...

First, exposing the manifestations of this law, head
1981, Mitterrand put an end to the hegemony of the right
1986, at the end of the parliamentary defeat of the left ...
1988, failure of the right to power, Mitterrand was reelected, dissolution, the new majority gives way ...
1993, the Berezina majority Balladur came to power
1995, the right continues, but it remains remarkably at the expense of existing staff - Sarkozy will remember the lesson suffered
1997, parliamentary elections? change of majority
2002, Rebelote
2007 as in 1995 the right manages to keep sending to block the existing staff.

short, the French are moaners and the result is pusillanimous: systematic change of majority subject to the assumption that wants a glorious part of the majority drew the wrath popular on the part of his ruling camp and succeeded well to replace it.

Consequences criticism: any disincentive to long-term policy, race demagoguery, moan Standing against the policies, vain belief that other policies could do better, ultimately transferring power to the political administration.

What?

Playing against his camp works see the election of Chirac and Sarkozy. Note that it is not so much a deliberate strategy that irreducible contingencies of personal rivalries. To defeat Sarkozy, left, would have done well ... reconcile with his predecessor ... to discredit the "rupture" and attributed to the Minister of the Interior's share in liabilities power.

Another hypothesis is to focus on the center ie attack the opponent in the second round ahead and ignore the extremes. Assumed dead since it failed with Jospin.

But then what? Reply: losing the election, rattles and other regional. Why? Because in giving plots of power to the opposition, local elections he withdrew the monopoly of the word utopian. In other words, once the opposition has a button on power, it can no longer argue that everything would be so much more beautiful once you have chosen.

This plan is vaguely Machiavellian he desired or is it an explanation of subsequent events that no one controls? In my opinion this is by design.

Two elements attest. First opening, which involved the movement of entrusting responsibility to the opposition, and thus deprive him of the hollow authority to promise anything and therefore raise the level of democratic debate. Secondly the systematicity of the successful opposition to small elections in recent years, the last case dated happens tonight. The

such legislation be thwarted? 2012 years-test. If the strategy works Sarkozy, promises the reign of the center-right for a while. In the absence of repolarization predictable French political landscape.

Milena Velba, Galerie

ILDEX Vietnam 2010 Vietnam 2010 March 25-27

For the second year, the company NUTRI ADVANCE GROUP ENTERPRISES be showcased at ILDEX Vietnam through its Feed Division.

We look forward to welcoming you on our booth # B27 (see plan), to talk about our different ingredients Progress ™.

For the 2nd year, Company NUTRI ADVANCE GROUP ENTERPRISES will be present through its Feed Division at the ILDEX Vietnam Show.

We will be happy to welcome you at our booth n°B27 (see floorplan ), to inform you about the different Innovative Ingredients we are promoting.

What Are People Posting Numbers For On Facebook

happy or mischievous rabbit?

did you saw we see almost a tooth?!

is one of my creations of winter, a crush simple (there I not invent the beast is the model citronille that everyone can find in the timeless children) and I added the ears. So what's ears, you say?
Rabbit?
Sheep?
Lama?
Dahu?
Martian ?.......... I digress ........
is as you please, in all cases, the stunning model who has the hat any sweet-hot all is well just go "crane" with the village and make smile grandmas cake walk!

Does Raven Riley Have Any Std Or Aids

Bella's mittens or how to succumb to the weakness of the current fashion (5 min)

And yes, I fainted in front these pretty little things warm to wear at the end of the arms. I copied some bloggers tricopathes the web, and yes, I know myself I have left by the tragic romantic atmosphere of twilight, the book teen of the moment (and yes where are the great French?)
So it was pretty easy, just wire (50g mix alpaca feather, chocolate and frozen grapes to me) model available here, the advice by it, and maneuvering the magic- loop adopted, and voila.
I tried earlier in ballad * VERDICT
much nicer is efficient against the cold. The one deserves to be: have them made (they will be very pretty in my closet or at the feet of my daughter to play) unless I can find silk gloves to put in below!
Sailing Sailing, I think it's hotter in real wool very thick hair that is not the mixture of mythical drugstore is a bad idea in this case! Because there hello tab looks like my old aunt!

Antibiotic Ciprolex Pregnancy

spoilers: Henry Kissinger, Friedman

Prior to the heads of Turkish protesters systematic, Henry Kissinger and Milton Friedman are two masters with oddly similar fates. Usually presented as two men of the System, will be shown here that this is nothing and that on the contrary, these two troublemakers were, each in their field, dethroned the conventional wisdom and prevented the expression of trends United States.

Immigrant and son of Jewish immigrants, some parties, achieved excellence, masters of their disciplines, the prince's advisers, admired their peers, they fought their separate ideas gained from their time, stood against the trends that we believe could be final: the Keynesian economics for an idealism in international relations to each other. One time they managed to turn the tide, to counteract the phenomenon of a side extension of the state and the tendency of economists to justify its intervention, on the other side of idealism in Western countries. These victories do should not last because the ideas they had thwarted deep roots and they opposed the demonstrations were erased with them.

One was awarded a Nobel Prize in Economics (1976), the other for peace (1973). Certainly one of these two prices is political (but not who you think).

Neither was interested in the discipline of another.

Milton Friedman has never written anything on diplomacy to my knowledge, neither prescribes a foreign policy doctrine.

As Kissinger presents a singular lack of responsiveness to ideas economic. Despite his great qualities we tend to see him in ignorance of the famous specialist who goes out of scope. In a rare excursion into economics, in his memoirs, he was convinced by the Pompidou's character would have catastrophic release of exchange rates ... For the record, he needed support in math when he was young.

The two advisors were of the same prince, Richard Nixon, but with a difference of obvious influence: Kissinger was damned soul; Friedman, whose ideas had not yet triomphées was instead often frustrated by the conduct Nixon: Policy inflation, price controls interim (by calculation demagogic and more). (Correction: not by the destruction of the gold standard as I mentioned in a previous version).

Both opérèrent a break today and it appears that they were not definitive and that the ordinary course of things was reattached.

I) Rupture of Milton Friedman

The paradigm to which Milton Friedman is opposed Keynesianism as everyone knows. A great advantage of this doctrine for politicians is that it justifies state intervention in the economic field. Rather than criminalizing Friedman the perverse effects of interventionism.

In particular, Friedman has criticized the policies based on an analysis of the Phillips curve, which asserts that political power has the power to arbitrate between unemployment and inflation (the Keynesian Phelps has also demonstrated the futility and negative such long-term policies).

The failure of Keynesian stimulation of the 70s and the inability to explain the phenomenon of stagflation (inflation and unemployment simultaneously) leads to the success of Friedman's monetarist theories. The party is over: the State should intervene less. Nevertheless

Friedman's theory, which requires a certain policy inaction, between door-to-step with the vocation of politics. Friedman is indirectly responsible for the establishment of independent central banks even if he personally opposed as not finding the Democratic measure. The state in turn is brought to continually expand its scope. And there was the closing of the divestment of its heritage.

II) The failure of Henry Kissinger

As shown by the famous epistemologist Karl Popper, a large bias runs the Western world: the belief in the character manifest the truth, which means that the truth stands before us and that is enough to remove barriers to seize it. To summarize: tails, this prejudice has our scientific development, opposite side: witch-hunting (in fact it is in modern times and not the Middle Ages that has burned more of the witches). This prejudice is reflected in political progressivism that encourages us to progress but has a deplorable tendency to blacken the past and blame.

Progressivism West manifests itself in two ways in the interpretation of international relations.

Outside the U.S.: the existence of evil, the lack of democracy and tyranny, we explain these phenomena, not by causes but by the endogenous action of a malicious entity. Now the U.S. is the most powerful country in the world. Since we do lend to the rich, the USA are regularly charged any disorder, coup and war (and even earthquakes). There are countless people who believe that having a critical means for keeping the U.S. guilty without evidence.

Inside the U.S.: progressivism embodied in the desire to expand the world economic system and politics is democracy, free markets, freedom of the press etc.. This translates into an idealistic foreign policy, that is to say, liberal in the vocabulary of international relations.

is this doctrine which leads to the interventions of the U.S. military abroad: involvement in the war of 14-18 is based on the ideal of the right of peoples to self-same, 39-45 is in the fight against Nazism, the commitments of the Cold War against communism.

optimistic view of this trend, there is the realist, intellectually brilliant but whose requirements are opposed to the underlying trends the country: there are Kennan (the author of the doctrine of containment, realistic in its prescription, idealistic in its execution), Morgenthau and Kissinger course.

When Kissinger became the adviser to President Richard Nixon, the country is already mired in the Vietnam War. It will continue the war as a withdrawal without a peace agreement would destroy the credibility of the United States from its allies during the Cold War. If

Kissinger will be able to conduct its policy realist, because American idealism is the ground: the sinking of the United States in the Vietnam War with its dead, its massacres, its scandals made doubt the United States. His people lose faith in the universality of its values. That time of My Lai , where it was discovered that the U.S. Army was an army like any other, no more heroic and sometimes disgusting. How can a just war could soon lead to the sadistic slaughter of a village?

This situation is untenable for the Left. The Democratic establishment in power dissolves suddenly disappears and Johnson does not even represent. Great depression. Public opinion began to turn. It is in these circumstances that Kissinger came to power under the wing of Nixon and then will conduct its policy. The festival is finite foreign countries do not want our armed imperialism of good intentions.

Kissinger meant to deal with non-democratic when it is in the interest of the country and the rapprochement with China as those who saw communist countries as a bloc could not imagine the ideology from the second plan, as well as the relative support for the South American dictatorships to prevent implantation of countries subject to Moscow - a fear that appears excessive in retrospect.

A realistic policy goal is not only the relative elevation of the country, it seeks the balance of power, not simply effect of these policies but a goal. It also aims to maintain an international order which is nothing to suggest that a different configuration would be better, besides the fact that his birth would not happen without convulsion.

Thus Kissinger noted that criticism of the Shah for its lack of democracy has resulted in the end a regime worse than to refer the responsibility of the Cambodian genocide to the anti-war, emphasized that a rigid application of principles is a source conflict.

But pushing the promotion of democratic ideals, Kissinger harbored suspicion against his country, suspected of acting for reasons reactionary or interested. He ate inside. It would indeed be a contradiction to see a fight there right / left. In reality this should be a straight shoot down idealism of the legacy of Kissinger: neoconservatism.

III) temporary disruptions

Friedman and Kissinger had won a battle, especially through their will and personality, but the trends they were fighting had deep roots: the intervention of the state and in Western idealism international relations phenomena are resilient. Both men had won a fight intellectual but trends remained. Their ideas would in turn be overturned. The vector of this reversal should not be debate. These were the passions that would lead the assault.

Kissinger had few allies, it was attacked by both the left and doves by the hawks of the right. They do not forgive him relax, which they interpreted as a retreat. In other words, Kissinger was faced with the idealism of the left and right! By attacking Kissinger, left, was felt to attack the right. In reality it provided ammunition for critics of Kissinger worst, the neoconservatives, whose doctrine command to export by force of arms if need democracy.

Kissinger is not forbidden, it was quickly taken for granted that what he was accused were true. Regardless of lack of evidence. In particular it appears to many people acquired the coup against Allende in 1973 bears the imprint of Kissinger. In fact his involvement has never been demonstrated that despite the vast amount of open archives. (This obsession to involve in my opinion reveals Kissinger's refusal to admit that this move has causes endogenous)

After a few years the neoconservatives took power and legacy of Kissinger was rejected. Idealism was back. Certainly one does not understand foreign policy of the United States if we do not want to see it is guided by idealism and not, as the fans believe the conspiracy theory, by material interests more or less secret. From Woodrow Wilson to George W Bush through Kennedy, the United States are the heralds of progressivism, liberalism and democracy. The United States has a military force that they want to use to improve the world and promote their values. It is promoting them they are looking and not material gain when they engage in Europe in 1917, in 1941, creating the United Nations, in adopting the doctrine of containment that requires them to intervene anywhere for that to fight evil absolute communism, trying the Iraq adventure to liquidate a socialist dictatorship and hope to reform the greater Middle East does not understand the mistrust and resistance they provoke. How many times does he repeat it?

As Friedman, it was decided that it was a big fan of South American dictatorships and the architect of privatization conducted through state terrorism see the thesis of the essay writer Naomi Klein. More generally it has been held for the financial architect of the configuration currently in crisis. To fell

Kissinger has been called cynical doctrine. To fell Friedman, said of his doctrine that it was undemocratic and vicious. Each time it was explained that these doctrines revealed the truth of the United States, accounted for his system, while not specifically they had neutralized the underlying trends of this country. Ruse of history, the overthrow of these doctrines are presented as a work of subversion when it was actually a reaction that allowed Return to the natural tendencies of the United States: idealism and interventionism.

loss of influence of the doctrines of the two men were found today: abysmal deficits and increasing state control over society on the one hand, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to install democracy on the other.

Smoke Grenades For Airsoft

Skirts everywhere!! The

So some time ago that I announced to have made a skirt from Burda. I put several Once made tournicoti several times too and I 've still not proved she was alive and well. So now here she is alive and well, it's on, the evidence verrrrry beautiful images (made in Valentin)

And then during my wanderings and webesques blogosphere, I came across this skirt, pretty no? Then I read the explanation, as does everything (yes, because sometimes I do not like, and good results!)

I used a cotton cloth, chambray color, a little stiff, but hey I would have preferred something more fluid, not serious. And the result is super nice. Well I will not wear it to go to work on because you look at me oddly (and must remain so in the track, unfortunately) but I sure the door Friday, I'll be on holiday, vacation and we do what we please (there is not until May!)

What To Wear To Ice Skating Date

The global warming debate rotten

There is currently a challenge to the consensus that global warming is a fact. Finally, "questioning" is saying a lot. Say that some fans have decided that global warming was the Trojan horse of statism.

A little ad hominem

Witness the number of complacency on Drieu Godefrid lemonde.fr:
The IPCC is dead, long live the debate! , charges against the "intellectual terrorism" and the arrogance of scientists. Perhaps the author does not he know that we like to open World forums for points of view to the best curry in the aftershocks that follow. At this game, the world rarely invites the best champion of the cause he wants to demolish.

What bothers me most is that the person is called liberal and lover of Hayek. Oculos habentes not videbunt. Would make it part of those silly liberals who see conspiracies everywhere statist, make a fixette on Islamofascism and love the neocons?

Enough ad hominem. Returning to the subject. What do we know about global warming?

Answer: on the one hand what we said and the other the knowledge of some phenomena that pose no debate such as melting glaciers and thousands of tropical species moving to areas believed to be colder.

Personally I did not consider the evidence of the climate debate. As the climate skeptics love to point out, there are many fake experts in this debate, wish to caution artificial just means that their opinion is that of others. I do not know, I say and I do not have to go have fun putting together my opinion myself. The search for truth ends of the amateur too often taking their bladders for lanterns.

If I did not know, I can still see something that is absolutely striking weakness of the argument climatosceptiques and its accompaniment by a powerful ideological interpretation.

The rationale of climatoscepticisme: very questionable data

climatosceptiques The argument focuses on multiple data it showed the total emptiness with reason (glaciers of the Himalayas curve of Al Gore, temperature readings impaired etc.). Far from seeing the necessary occurrence of error of fallible men, or simply to be humble in victory, she thinks it the beginning of a general forgery, which it will be a farce as you pull on the wire a knit to defeat him.

But in reality, despite all their efforts if the climate skeptics have been able to find these few facts on which they dwell, it is precisely because they can not find anything. They were in no way capable of reversing the general pattern of facts in favor of the theory of global warming climate.

However they did reveal several cases particularly lamentable lack of discipline among climatologists and are behind the downward revision of forecasts too many catastrophic. This must be credited to them.

The basis of irrational climatoscepticisme: suspicion policy

climatosceptiques Why have so many suspicions against the theory of global warming and convenience for the climatological conspiracy theory? Because there is something rotten in the debate on global warming, which is the ease with which the global warming theory lends itself to political interpretation.

lever criticism: millenarianism

Indeed, this theory has the features of a millenarian: the world's end is near (the temperature increases, we will be submerged), it is the consequence of your sins ( selfish consumers), adopt a more frugal life, throw your wealth, obey the prophets. Moreover, this theory is mixed easily with sentimentality (the poor countries will be hit first ... of course!), Low critical thinking (denial of any debate, hatred of dissent) and of course, and above all: the state (it must transform the planned economy system, trust us).

Although global warming is a correct theory, promoting it is not indifferent to some ideological considerations and it would be good for people to make serious diminishing of the household and other fun.

It is also remarkable that we felt as the announcement of a permanent disaster: what about the hole in the ozone layer? He made pshit. What about DDT? Influenza A? bird flu? From the financial crisis? Etc. What fuel suspicion.

Ideology of climate skeptics climate skeptics

The rest are not. Actually, they are more ideological in this story, you can say both that global warming does not exist and that global warming exists but does not have a human source ... The coincidence between the harm they award putative warming and cure state attributed to him is decisive in their belief so-called climate skeptics.

Treatment of fact is unable to refrain from ideological criticism: we're just so errors and excesses of those who support the existence of global warming to illustrate a phenomenon which it was decided that the causes were political.

amusing detail: even the climate skeptics who sneer at those who rely on speech to scientists at the IPCC they drink blogs to find out ...



Conclusion The relative success of the climate skeptics are at least critic is also positive: the confrontation will take place and a camp withdraw legitimacy. In the meantime he should not mix the causes and in particular does not involve the risk of climate skeptics question to other issues such as economic liberalism, as if a market economy was not able to cope with the challenge global warming where it is established.

Software 3d Apartment Extreme

Avatar movie going to war? Walter

I bounced here on Pierre Desjardins opinion expressed in an article in Monde.fr January 27 last.

The author argues nothing less Avatar contains an apology for the war (Title: Re: nothing but a stupid justification for war!): War is just if just cause but in reality both sides have always believed this, we get a justification for war in general ... The premise of the author seems to be that there is no just war, denouncing excess to fall into the opposite. Damage.

This criticism is wrong in my opinion in that the phenomenon at work is not confined to Avatar and did not have the meaning ascribed to it by the critic. Indeed, the problem is not the glorification of war that disinhibition face of evil and not own Avatar, that is the most action movies.

observe them. The spring action film or comedy is ugly: the personification of evil in the character of the villain makes the hero needed the use of violence, let us note, however, enjoys it. Just as the viewer. Far from wanting to watch the triumph of good against evil, the audience wants to enjoy the vice, violence, sadism, power, but without realizing it:) So

action movies they make turn turn in the proper stage robber, good avenger ... and regarding the war good Avatar.

sad fate as the villain: an actor who expresses an evil to the extent of the lot of suffering that awaits to satisfy the audience ... I sometimes take pity on the wicked because his illness is fiction and pretense the expression of an evil sadist more tangible. Obviously

this phenomenon that we find pleasure in doing evil and seek to justify the property does not limit itself to cinema. It is human. It is found especially among the beautiful souls who hunt the dragon in the name of the property but in reality for the sake of burning those whose sacrifices and devotion are all means to gain concessions, print and behaviors hold the power ... Beware of good intentions. Evil is not in others, it is in everyone's heart.

To go further, indicate that neither the flaws of Avatar, pleasant entertainment, nor those action movies can not be summarized line described above. If in Avatar was given a nasty form of an army of a people warlike invaders to justify war and violence in response, he was also given attributes technological, scientific, modern capitalist in a word such that hero renounces its people, culture and even its nature to reach a primitive tribe, traditional, mystical ... and new age .... nervous system merged with nature ... Striking illustration of the double standard incident against reactionary ideas: between inadmissibility and convenience as the one who expresses them is equal or the noble savage. Thus the film

action reflects the prejudices of the time and built a straw man against whom the defect can be expressed with pleasure. it looks like.