remember above all that in a bipartisan system, the objective ally of the ruling party an edge is the party Challenges on the other side. I'm not coming here on the various illustrations of this rule.
Two years ago I wrote an article explaining how the right beat left .
To summarize my article at the time, I explained that Presidents Bush and Sarkozy drew a picture of each party governing rightist though in fact the center-right, so what good hysteresis their opposition and divide between moderates and excited. So they based their power.
Remarkably United States today is that this mechanism has turned against the right: tea parties, a movement on horseback between libertarianism and populism, are reinforced with a speech very hostile to Obama, but mostly at the expense of Republicans in my opinion.
So a few years ago the Left was divided between intransigent anti-bush liberal and moderate criticism of Bush, they fear extremism of those. Today the line is divided between the same uncompromising anti-establishment anti-obama and moderate criticism of Obama, they fear the same extremism of those.
Hysteria has changed sides. The reversal was done in two stages.
First he had to unite the left. How to re-link between left Michael Moore and that of the establishment? Answer: by presenting a candidate who embodies the progressive ideals. So it's no coincidence that the bid was played between a woman and a black. Such a candidate neutralized the destructive capacity of leftists, who could only yield to the fear of being on the wrong side of history and block the forward march of progress. Fiat Obama, a man who could embody a leftist dream while being a staunch centrist. Perfect combination.
Then the Republican camp was divided. The Republicans promise eternally late big government but never really give a result in power, that they now criticized by the tea parties.
There is also the downfall of the neocons, associated with the establishment Republican, held accountable for the Iraq war which is perceived badly the foundation and utility. The tea parties, more libertarian, and therefore oppose the war in Iraq benefit.
Finally it is a general rejection of the elites and the authorities, even a conspiracy movement, who knows illegitimate and does not wish to comment as such. He needs to be grafted to another speech and found this expression vector in tea parties - which I condemn Notice the movement forward.
So Republicans are unable to capitalize on errors and Obama will lose in fine tea party movement. The rule set out in the lead article is the test may be even earlier than I had expected because it appears that Republicans could not win the legislative end of the year when he was still expected there is little they are the big winners.
Two years ago I wrote an article explaining how the right beat left .
To summarize my article at the time, I explained that Presidents Bush and Sarkozy drew a picture of each party governing rightist though in fact the center-right, so what good hysteresis their opposition and divide between moderates and excited. So they based their power.
Remarkably United States today is that this mechanism has turned against the right: tea parties, a movement on horseback between libertarianism and populism, are reinforced with a speech very hostile to Obama, but mostly at the expense of Republicans in my opinion.
So a few years ago the Left was divided between intransigent anti-bush liberal and moderate criticism of Bush, they fear extremism of those. Today the line is divided between the same uncompromising anti-establishment anti-obama and moderate criticism of Obama, they fear the same extremism of those.
Hysteria has changed sides. The reversal was done in two stages.
First he had to unite the left. How to re-link between left Michael Moore and that of the establishment? Answer: by presenting a candidate who embodies the progressive ideals. So it's no coincidence that the bid was played between a woman and a black. Such a candidate neutralized the destructive capacity of leftists, who could only yield to the fear of being on the wrong side of history and block the forward march of progress. Fiat Obama, a man who could embody a leftist dream while being a staunch centrist. Perfect combination.
Then the Republican camp was divided. The Republicans promise eternally late big government but never really give a result in power, that they now criticized by the tea parties.
There is also the downfall of the neocons, associated with the establishment Republican, held accountable for the Iraq war which is perceived badly the foundation and utility. The tea parties, more libertarian, and therefore oppose the war in Iraq benefit.
Finally it is a general rejection of the elites and the authorities, even a conspiracy movement, who knows illegitimate and does not wish to comment as such. He needs to be grafted to another speech and found this expression vector in tea parties - which I condemn Notice the movement forward.
So Republicans are unable to capitalize on errors and Obama will lose in fine tea party movement. The rule set out in the lead article is the test may be even earlier than I had expected because it appears that Republicans could not win the legislative end of the year when he was still expected there is little they are the big winners.
0 comments:
Post a Comment