Why young people do not get a job?
Where it is claimed that Nicolas Sarkozy is not for nothing (to increase my draw as the newspapers?)
Two reasons to question the title:
1) The lack of economy by youth
2) Ignorance of the economy by the old.
And I'm not talking about the discipline of social sciences but human interaction and exchange of the production.
Begin.
1) Young people do not understand the economy
Far be it from me to play in the national education demagogic anti Yet the problem lies partly in our education system.
Both the content of education as the mode of teaching have perverse effects.
Content - The content of teaching abstract, is largely irrelevant to the future professional life. It would be curious to know what proportion of workers uses his knowledge acquired in school for his business? Definitely a weak hand.
It is worthwhile to learn the history, Latin, and organic chemistry. But these teachings have no practical purpose. And because of their number, they take up more teaching manuals. (Crowding)
It is true that students, in keeping with the times, have little regard for the teaching manuals.
It is especially true that the real purpose of the content of teaching is not to teach but to select. Should we be satisfied with this hypocrisy?
Thus the education system appears to us already separated from the production system, which allows me to come to the second part the problem, and most important mode of teaching.
Teaching methods - After all these years on the benches of the school, the student has assimilated the logic. However he does not know that the world of work. Now the two worlds obey very different rules.
At school he asked the student to be obedient (including and even especially in matters where it is said to express the spirit of criticism). Obedience and thus the right notes all the doors open. In the school system you are free to guide you as you would be subject to the notes permit. And to have these notes, we must dig. It's the same logic as pocket money. We must know how to balance between demand and be wise.
In the world of work, obedience is required but what is required above all is to be useful, productive. It must make money, at least to cover its own cost.
But the student, he does odd jobs or not, seems to remain a prisoner of the logic of the school: he believes the right to choose as he wishes his career path by paying for his effort.
But this is nothing. The worker become does not fit in a school but on the labor market. He can choose what he wants but what the market offers. The market offers just about everything, but not at the same price, the price depending on supply and demand and therefore the social value of employment required and the scarcity of talent needed.
In other words, the school serves is itself in the world of work we are in the service of others, because the cons-party compensation is made trravail, service record.
The lack of integration between education and the production system has resulted to nourish illusions. The working world is made of jobs that must satisfy both producers and consumers.
believe that society should provide everyone with the job he wants is unrealistic and selfish. In this sense - and only this - that Thatcher had told There Is No Such Thing as Society .
circuis Sealing between education and production also has the perverse effect of promoting the atomization of the individual. This fragmentation manifests itself in several ways. First, as noted above, it feeds the belief that the individual chooses the path that do not care regardless of what the company request.
other hand is the work that integrates the best in life. In this regard include the full truth of a formula that has unfortunately corrupted the Nazis: Arbeit macht frei. By cynicism or to deceive their victims, the Nazis placed this formula at the entrance to their camps. Nevertheless, this formula is widely their earlier testimony and in my opinion a profound truth.
A final word about the artificiality of the school process. It is remarkable that the knowledge acquired at school are actually very quickly forgotten. Proof is in the spelling of all these students who left school as soon forget what they were taught to abide by the conventions of the groups they follow.
Get rid of this idea of a school that would serve as a cocoon where you teach in a neutral knowledge to minds blank.
How about it?
Sometimes I think that a solution could be to establish a kind of stock trades with prices would be communicated to students. In other words, students would experience revenue for each position and may be decided according to its price, even choose to be poorly paid but what you want.
But such a solution is likely to generate envy and social hatred.
I will therefore advise the integration between education and work history to dispel the earlier tragic misunderstandings.
2) The old man did not understand anything more to the economy
This is an optimistic hypothesis to explain their behavior because there is an alternative:
- The old man did not understand anything about the economy,
- They are deliberately malicious and prevent youth from getting a job.
Rigidity at the entrance of the labor market
believe that society should provide everyone with the job he wants is unrealistic and selfish. In this sense - and only this - that Thatcher had told There Is No Such Thing as Society .
circuis Sealing between education and production also has the perverse effect of promoting the atomization of the individual. This fragmentation manifests itself in several ways. First, as noted above, it feeds the belief that the individual chooses the path that do not care regardless of what the company request.
other hand is the work that integrates the best in life. In this regard include the full truth of a formula that has unfortunately corrupted the Nazis: Arbeit macht frei. By cynicism or to deceive their victims, the Nazis placed this formula at the entrance to their camps. Nevertheless, this formula is widely their earlier testimony and in my opinion a profound truth.
A final word about the artificiality of the school process. It is remarkable that the knowledge acquired at school are actually very quickly forgotten. Proof is in the spelling of all these students who left school as soon forget what they were taught to abide by the conventions of the groups they follow.
Get rid of this idea of a school that would serve as a cocoon where you teach in a neutral knowledge to minds blank.
How about it?
Sometimes I think that a solution could be to establish a kind of stock trades with prices would be communicated to students. In other words, students would experience revenue for each position and may be decided according to its price, even choose to be poorly paid but what you want.
But such a solution is likely to generate envy and social hatred.
I will therefore advise the integration between education and work history to dispel the earlier tragic misunderstandings.
2) The old man did not understand anything more to the economy
This is an optimistic hypothesis to explain their behavior because there is an alternative:
- The old man did not understand anything about the economy,
- They are deliberately malicious and prevent youth from getting a job.
Rigidity at the entrance of the labor market
We know the song, for social protection systems is the increased cost of labor and ultimately unemployment
Since it is not possible to return without risk severe financial penalties are hiring less.
simple and rational arguments but not understood by many people. It is the theory of insider / outsider. Summa divisio of the new world of work is that which separates those who have jobs and are protected by the system against those who have no work and are very insecure and have to accept various types of jobs precarious for the privileges of the first category.
If the PAYG system (sending Petainist way) is telling: not only does it ever increasing burdens on workers and thus increases the cost of labor and ultimately thwart the hiring of youth but in addition there is a wealth transfer from young to old. Doubling antisocial.
Negation productivity differences
Young people are less productive in that they are not trained and do not know the routines and generate logically less production. It should be added to what we lose in the short-term productivity of their trainers.
This is true in areas of high specialization.
In addition the employer takes a risk by hiring a new person as it may be incompetent and represent a dead weight now.
The new worker is producing less gold production that once sold gives revenues to the company and pay salaries. As a result it is illusory to believe that the new entrant should be paid like all other employees. To deny this is to prevent young people from getting to work.
Dominica de Villepin when he was prime minister, briefly introduced the First Employment Contract (CPE) which facilitated the breakdown between employer and hired a young CPE. Interpreted as the precariousness of youth employment, such a measure was intended rather to facilitate the integration of young people in the world of work.
Many young people marched and obtained the withdrawal of the CPE. Two consequences: they have removed a tool that was made in their interest, and they paved the way for the victory of Nicolas Sarkozy at the right time by eliminating its principal rival on the right. Funny, no?
Ultimately precarious increases. It is only the inevitable consequence of a youth who goes to jobs that society does not demand and labor costs too high. Emergent
a bunch of insecure jobs. The biggest success is that of course: it gives the employer a worker unskilled, poorly paid, and exploitable without continuity, it offers the student a wave formation and the right to register an online resume that approximates the Holy Grail: CDI ... The internship allows most short-circuit any legislation to protect workers.
Who emissions too bad hugs. The protection of workers turned against the weakest among them.
Since it is not possible to return without risk severe financial penalties are hiring less.
simple and rational arguments but not understood by many people. It is the theory of insider / outsider. Summa divisio of the new world of work is that which separates those who have jobs and are protected by the system against those who have no work and are very insecure and have to accept various types of jobs precarious for the privileges of the first category.
If the PAYG system (sending Petainist way) is telling: not only does it ever increasing burdens on workers and thus increases the cost of labor and ultimately thwart the hiring of youth but in addition there is a wealth transfer from young to old. Doubling antisocial.
Negation productivity differences
Young people are less productive in that they are not trained and do not know the routines and generate logically less production. It should be added to what we lose in the short-term productivity of their trainers.
This is true in areas of high specialization.
In addition the employer takes a risk by hiring a new person as it may be incompetent and represent a dead weight now.
The new worker is producing less gold production that once sold gives revenues to the company and pay salaries. As a result it is illusory to believe that the new entrant should be paid like all other employees. To deny this is to prevent young people from getting to work.
Dominica de Villepin when he was prime minister, briefly introduced the First Employment Contract (CPE) which facilitated the breakdown between employer and hired a young CPE. Interpreted as the precariousness of youth employment, such a measure was intended rather to facilitate the integration of young people in the world of work.
Many young people marched and obtained the withdrawal of the CPE. Two consequences: they have removed a tool that was made in their interest, and they paved the way for the victory of Nicolas Sarkozy at the right time by eliminating its principal rival on the right. Funny, no?
Ultimately precarious increases. It is only the inevitable consequence of a youth who goes to jobs that society does not demand and labor costs too high. Emergent
a bunch of insecure jobs. The biggest success is that of course: it gives the employer a worker unskilled, poorly paid, and exploitable without continuity, it offers the student a wave formation and the right to register an online resume that approximates the Holy Grail: CDI ... The internship allows most short-circuit any legislation to protect workers.
Who emissions too bad hugs. The protection of workers turned against the weakest among them.
In conclusion: what to do?
Teach better economy? Let down.
There are two things to do: 1 / integrate education and vocational training, 2 / flexible labor laws.
0 comments:
Post a Comment